"Legal" Theft by Government

Those of the libertarian bent are often accused byMotorsports Corp., owner and builder of Gateway
statists of overreacting to the predations ofInternational Raceway went to the Southwestern
government. “We are the government,”Illinois Development Authority (SWIDA) in an attempt
they say, “our elected officials are only doingto have nearly one hundred-fifty acres of privately
the things we elected them to do, so what's theowned land condemned so they could build a parking
problem?”lot for their race track. In that case, the landowners
In many (even most) cases they may be right. Wefought back and having survived several victories and
do tend to be a bit hypercritical of the machinationsreversals, at last report, the Illinois Supreme Court
of our leaders, but not always.had found for the landowner.
If you want a glimpse into predatory government atThese are big buck land grabs but the same thing is
its worst, take a look at what's going on in Alabaster,happening on a smaller scale all over the country and
Alabama.they are finally starting to generate some notice and
Alabaster is such a booming metropolis that I onlysome organized opposition. (See the Web site for
ever heard of it (until this week) as an occasionalthe Institute for Justice at [ under
reference in the old Pogo comic strip. So, what can“CASES,” the Southeastern Legal
the politicians of this little burg be doing thatFoundation at and the Castle Coalition for more
threatens the nation? They are stealing privateexamples)
property.Then the unthinkable happened. The United States
There is a tool used by government in order toSupreme Court, in a decision known as “Kelo
acquire property for public use. It's called 'eminentvs. New London, CT” stuck a dagger in the
domain.' Briefly, it is a Constitutional way forheart of every American property owner when they
government to force property owners to sell landsaid that government agencies actually had the
(for adequate compensation, of course) that may beRIGHT to seize private property under eminent
necessary for the construction of public facilities suchdomain and turn it over to other private interests.
as roads, bridges, utility rights-of-way, etc.The United States Constitutional protection of
At least that's the way it was for the first twoproperty ownership was destroyed by five black
hundred years of this Republic. Today though, therobed statists who see government power and its
political hacks in government have found a brand newability to raise money as more important than the
way to define what the terms public and necessaryrights of the people.
mean. They now say that additions or increases toThe right of people to own private property that is
the tax base of a community or bringing in new jobsnot subject to seizure on the whim of government is
can be viewed as contributing to the public good anda fundamental underpinning of any nation that claims
thus as a necessity.to be free. English Common Law asserted that right
In Alabaster, on one side, there is some land ownedas early as the Twelfth Century and our Founding
and occupied by plain old citizens, some of whomFathers used the Fifth Amendment to the U. S.
have lived there for nearly half a century. On theConstitution to guarantee that right to us.
other side, there is the Colonial Properties Trust, aGovernments, big and small are now usurping that
development company, which wants to build a hugeright any time they think there is tax money or
shopping center that includes a WalMart Super Store.political advantage to be had.
The problem is, some of the residents have noIn one city, an area was declared to be blighted
interest in selling their property. They see no reasondespite the fact that the homes were occupied and
why their lives should be disrupted just because awell maintained. In another, an entire neighborhood of
developer has chosen to build on their land.homes were condemned to allow the construction of
Enter the city government of Alabaster.a privately owned office park and “other
“You must sell,” they harumph. Theyunspecified uses.” In yet another, a county
insist that this project is “necessary”government condemned an occupied home, forced
because it will bring in many times the tax dollars ofthe residents out, then allowed the manager of a
the current residences. And if the landowners stillnearby golf course to move in.
refuse to sell, the city will use its power of eminentThe Christian Science Monitor's Alexandra Marks has
domain to condemn the land, force its sale atan article at describing more government property
extremely low prices and then the city will sell thepredation and the sometimes bizarre stratagems
land to Colonial and the shopping center will be built.used to justify their taking, including a case where a
I wonder if the late storeowner of the people, Samgovernment agency condemned the property of one
Walton, is spinning in his grave at the thought of thesmall business so it could be transferred to another
power of the government being used to seize folkssmall business.
property to be used for one of his namesakeIf America's governments are allowed to continue to
stores?use (or abuse) their power in order to seize the
And just in case you think this is only an isolatedproperty of American citizens for no other reason
instance, read on.than that they can derive political capital from the
In New York City, the venerable New York Timesdeal through turning the land over to those with
wanted to build a brand new headquarters inmore wealth or political power, our nation, as we
Manhattan. They selected a block which contained aknow it, will not survive.
number of established businesses and went aboutAnd it's not just state and local governments that
trying to convince the owners to sell. As in Alabaster,are involved. The Feds have taken millions of acres
AL, some of the owners didn't want to sell becauseof land so it can be “protected” from
they would be unable to relocate their businessesthe very citizens that provide the tax money to
with the amount of money they were offered. Infinance the seizures. It's time for the American
due course the NYT, having much political power inpeople to stand up to government at all levels and a
the City, went to the politicians, who dutiflygreat way to start would be to stop the
condemned the recalcitrant business's properties andunconstitutional and perfidious misapplication of the
turned it over to the Times.doctrine of eminent domain.
In East St. Louis, IL, the Gateway International© 2005 Charles Stone, Jr.